PHENOMENA STUDIES WEAVER AXIOM
Studies Archive About
← INDEX

STUDY #04  ·  2026 · IN OBSERVATION

BZ II — Thermal Fields

A model-driven visual study of one chemistry split into many regimes by heat.

MOVING IMAGE — SKY / SEA tfield step · Ea 4 · Ea_f −2

WHAT IS THIS

Temperature is the invisible conductor of the BZ reaction. A chemical reaction's rate follows the Arrhenius law — warm faster, cold slower — so in a dish that is not the same temperature everywhere, the oscillation runs at different speeds in different places. You never see the temperature itself; you only see what it does to the waves: their wavelength, the bending of their fronts, where their sources gather.

This study takes #01's Oregonator reaction–diffusion system and multiplies its reaction rate by a prescribed temperature field. Where a region's stoichiometry is also made temperature-dependent, its whole pattern regime shifts — so a single canvas can hold turbulence and calm at once. The temperature field is treated as a frozen landscape given from outside; the reaction runs on top of it.

sky over sea — step temperature seam
sky over sea — step temperature seam step · horizon 0.62 · Ea 4 · Ea_f −2
Motif BZ reaction / Oregonator with a temperature field / phase & wave-speed gradients
Method The study #01 GPU (GLSL) reaction–diffusion engine was extended with an Arrhenius temperature field that modulates the local reaction rate — and, where a region's stoichiometry is temperature-dependent, its pattern regime. Built and modified with AI assistance; the geographies and the look were chosen through parameter exploration. The moving pieces animate the temperature field itself while the waves keep running.
Observation One medium reads as many worlds — a churning warm sky over a calm cold sea, chirped targets, pacemaker spots, organic geographies. Hotter means a faster clock, a shorter wavelength, and a thinner, sharper line. Colour follows temperature, not a catalyst.
Reference S. Arrhenius, "Über die Reactionsgeschwindigkeit bei der Inversion von Rohrzucker durch Säuren," Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, vol.4, 226-248 (1889); J. J. Tyson & P. C. Fife, The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol.73, 2224-2237 (1980).
Tools Python / NumPy / three.js / React / GLSL / ffmpeg / AI coding assistant
Year 2026

This is not a scientific simulation result, but a visual interpretation of the phenomenon.

WHAT CHANGED FROM #01

A deliberately different picture.

Study #01 — BZ Study #04 — Thermal
Colour from the catalyst’s oxidation state — navy to gold from temperature — ice-blue to ember-orange
Composition one allover texture, edge to edge a geography inside the frame — with negative space where heat stills the reaction
Motion the waves propagate the field itself drifts, and the waves reorganise beneath it

PARAMETERS EXPLORED

param meaning effect on the image
tfield temperature-field shape step: a sky/sea two-phase world · radial: rings tightening toward the warm centre · spots: pacemakers · blobs: organic thermal geography · gradient: a wavelength chirp
Ea Arrhenius sensitivity of the clock larger values widen the hot⇄cold speed difference — a stronger wavelength gradient
Ea_f temperature-dependent stoichiometry pushed negative, hot regions turn turbulent while cold regions go still — the main lever behind the sky/sea density contrast
T_lo / T_hi temperature range the range of speeds inside one field — the pressure range of the pen
horizon / seam step position & boundary width the sky-to-sea ratio, and how hard the coastline is
morph animating the temperature field the landscape drifts and the waves re-solve around it — the core of the moving pieces

Each image below records its exact parameter set.

THE MATHEMATICS the model behind the images

Study #01’s Oregonator, with every reaction term multiplied by an Arrhenius rate field φ(x,y) — the invisible temperature that speeds or slows the local chemical clock.

∂u∂t=φ(x,y) 1ε[ u(1−u)−f v u−qu+q ]+Du ∇2u\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \varphi(x,y)\,\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\left[\, u(1-u) - f\,v\,\frac{u-q}{u+q} \,\right] + D_u\,\nabla^2 u∂t∂u​=φ(x,y)ε1​[u(1−u)−fvu+qu−q​]+Du​∇2u
The fast variable, its clock scaled by φ.
∂v∂t=φ(x,y) (u−v)+Dv ∇2v\frac{\partial v}{\partial t} = \varphi(x,y)\,(u - v) + D_v\,\nabla^2 v∂t∂v​=φ(x,y)(u−v)+Dv​∇2v
The slow variable, scaled by the same φ — the nullclines are unchanged; only the local time-scale moves.
φ(x,y)=exp⁡ ⁣[ Ea(1T0−1T(x,y))]\varphi(x,y) = \exp\!\left[\, E_a\left(\frac{1}{T_0} - \frac{1}{T(x,y)}\right)\right]φ(x,y)=exp[Ea​(T0​1​−T(x,y)1​)]
The Arrhenius field. Hotter means a faster clock, a shorter wavelength, and thinner sharper lines; letting f and q depend on T lets one canvas hold turbulence and calm at once.

Inspired by the Oregonator with an Arrhenius-type temperature field. E_a is a model knob, not a measured activation energy.

SELECTED STILLS — 5

sky over sea
sky over sea step · horizon 0.62 · Ea 4 · Ea_f −2
high horizon — a wide swelling sea
high horizon — a wide swelling sea step · horizon 0.76 · Ea 4 · Ea_f −2
chirped target rising
chirped target rising radial · Ea 4 · Ea_f −2
pacemaker rings
pacemaker rings spots · Ea 4 · Ea_f −2
organic thermal geography
organic thermal geography blobs · Ea 4 · Ea_f −2

COLOUR = TEMPERATURE

Study #01 coloured the field by the catalyst's oxidation state. This study changes the logic: here hue comes from the invisible temperature. A cold steel-blue ice and a hot ember orange sit at the two ends of the field.

The wave amplitude sets the luminance, and the crest lifts toward white-hot. So the thermal geography reads as colour while the chemistry reads as light — which is what lets the same medium look like a warm sky over a cold sea.

The palette is an artistic mapping of an abstract temperature, not a measured colour.

organic thermal geography — warm ridges, cold valleys
organic thermal geography — warm ridges, cold valleys blobs · Ea 4 · Ea_f −2

Palette ice_ember — hue = temperature · luminance = wave amplitude · crest → white-hot.

REFERENCES

  1. S. Arrhenius. "Über die Reactionsgeschwindigkeit bei der Inversion von Rohrzucker durch Säuren." Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, vol.4, 226-248 (1889).
  2. J. J. Tyson, P. C. Fife. "Target patterns in a realistic model of the Belousov-Zhabotinskii reaction." The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol.73, 2224-2237 (1980).
  3. R. Luther. "Räumliche Fortpflanzung chemischer Reactionen." Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie, vol.12, 596-600 (1906).

INTERACTIVE STUDY

A small window into the model behind this study — a deliberately simplified instrument, reduced in resolution, scope, and rendering. The finished works above are something else entirely: parameters swept, frames chosen, and graded by hand from the full engine. Slide the horizon and the heat, and watch one chemistry split into two worlds.

SIMPLIFIED INSTRUMENTOREGONATOR × ARRHENIUS · LIVELENS — TEMPERATURE FIELD

This interactive study is not intended as a scientifically validated reproduction. It is a visual interpretation generated from an implemented model and curated parameter exploration — and it is a deliberately simplified instrument, separate from the full engine used to author the finished works.

← ALL STUDIES STUDY #05 · LORENZ ATTRACTOR · IN OBSERVATION →
PHENOMENA STUDIES — WEAVER AXIOM PERSONAL VISUAL RESEARCH · © 2026